Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 8;92(5):1172–1180. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29367

TABLE 1.

Publications analyzed for trends in 24-h urinary sodium excretion in the United States, 1957–20031

Reference (study year) Trial name Study type Location (US state postal abbreviation) Participants Age Women Black or African American Systolic and diastolic blood pressure Urine measurements Urine sodium
n y % % mm Hg n mmol or mEq/24 h
Nishizaka et al (23) (2000–2004)23 NA PC AL 265 56 ± 124 56 43 Blacks: 160 ± 27 and 91 ± 18; whites: 160 ± 27and 87 ± 15 1 Blacks: 172 ± 85; whites: 194 ± 74
Nishizaka et al (24) (2003)35 NA PC AL 76 55 ± 12 59 59 163 ± 18 and 91 ± 14 1 189 ± 75
Carbone et al (25) (2002)6 NA SV TN 89 647 100 44 NR 1 143 ± 64
Calhoun et al (26) (2001–2002)3 NA PC AL 88 57 ± 12 62 49 159 ± 24 and 90 ± 16 1 169 ± 71
Chapman et al (27) (2001)358 NA NRT GA, MN 505 487 52 44 Men: 144 ± 13 and 97 ± 5; women: 149 ± 13 and 96 ± 5; whites: 142 ± 12 and 95 ± 5; blacks: 153 ± 14 and 97 ± 5 1 Men: 182 ± 75; women: 146 ± 57; whites: 161 ± 66; blacks: 167 ± 62
Taylor and Curhan (28) (1994–1999; 2001)9 Health Professionals Follow-Up Study PC National 1003 637 0 0 NR 3 176
Taylor and Curhan (28) (1994–1999; 2001)9 NHS PC National 1286 657 100 0 NR 3 142
Taylor and Curhan (28) (1994–1999; 2001)9 NHS II PC National 984 487 100 0 NR 3 152
Powell et al (29) (2000) NA SV National 5942 43–4810 29 NR NR 1 Men: 180; women: 139
Sacks et al (30) (1997–1999)311 DASH-S RCT MA, NC, OR, MD, LA 412 487 56 56 Control; 135 ± 10 and 86 ± 4; DASH-S: 134 ± 10 and 86 ± 5 1 155 ± 75
Zhou et al (31) (1997–1999) INTERMAP SV IL, MS, HI, MN, TX, PA, MD 2195 497 50 NR NR NR Men: 161 ± 51; women: 127 ± 40
Ripley et al (32) (1998)358 NA NRT VA 18 447 78 50 Baseline, supine: black, 150 ± 12 and 88 ± 5; whites, 144 ± 8 and 86 ± 9 1 Blacks: 117 ± 51; whites: 140 ± 50
McCarron et al (33) (1996)358 NA RCT OR, IN, MI, SC, PA, AL 99 52 ± 10 42 24 134 ± 11 and 86 ± 6 1 141 ± 62
Appel et al (34) (1994–1996)311 Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension RCT MA, NC, OR, MD, LA 459 447 49 60 Ambulatory: 132 ± 10 and 84 ± 4 1 136 ± 54
Dawson-Hughes et al (35) (1995)5 Sites Testing Osteoporosis Prevention/Intervention Trial SV NE, CT, MA 914 717 73 NR NR 1 Men: 156 ± 58; women: 118 ± 44
Appel et al (36) (1992–1994)3 Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly RCT NJ, MD, NC 639 66 ± 5 47 23 127 ± 9 and 71 ± 7 2 Men: 161 ± 54; women: 126 ± 45
Kumanyika et al (37) (1990–1992)12 Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase II RCT MD, CA, MS, TN, NJ, OR, PA, MO, AL 1138 447 34 17 Men: 127 ± 6 and 86 ± 2; women: 128 ± 7 and 86 ± 2; whites: 127 ± 6 and 86 ± 2; blacks: 128 ± 7 and 86 ± 2 1 Men: 203 ± 84; women: 155 ± 63; whites; 192 ± 73; blacks: 166 ± 132
Smith et al (38) (1991)35813 Piedmont Health Survey of the Elderly RCT NC 21 66 ± 6 43 29 150 ± 5 and 86 ± 3 1–3 192 ± 50
Davis et al (39) (1991)58 Trial of Antihypertensive Interventions and Management RCT NY, AL, MS 785 497 44 NR 145 and 94 NR 134
Loria et al (40) (1990)14 CARDIA PC AL, IL, MN, CA 906 307 57 54 NR 3 Men: 195; women: 156; blacks: 170; whites: 176
Kumanyika et al (41), Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group (42), and Whelton et al (43) (1987–1990)15 Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase I RCT MD, AL, CA, MA, MS, TN, NJ, PA, OR, MO 2182 437 30 15 125 and 84 2 Men: 170 ± 68; women: 131 ± 54
Alderman et al (44) (1981–1990)3816 NA PC NY 2937 537 35 NR Men: 150 ± 18 and 98 ± 9; women: 150 ± 18 and 94 ± 10 1 Men: 12617; women: 9717
Krishna et al (45) (1989)68 NA RCT PA 10 307 0 0 120 ± 2 and 76 ± 2 1 163 ± 47
Weinberger et al (46) (1988)3 NA NRT IN 114 517 30 13 NR 3 170 ± 66
Schmieder et al (47) (1988)35 NA SV LA 37 NR NR NR NR 1 136 ± 69
INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group (48, 49) (1986)18 INTERSALT SV IL, MS, HI 1150 20–59 NR NR 118 ± 13 and 74 ± 9 1 158 ± 61
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents (50) (1986)358 Veterans Administration Cooperative Study RCT MS, FL, TN, AL, DC 623 497 0 65 Whites: 145 ± 17 and 100 ± 6; blacks: 147 ± 17 and 101 ± 7 1 Whites: 184 ± 108; blacks: 176 ± 117
Langford et al (51) (1985)3 Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program RCT NY, AL, MS 425 577 NR NR NR 1 146 ± 67
Kaplan et al (52) (1985)19 NA RCT TX 16 497 62 81 131 ± 3 and 96 ± 1 1 166 ± 19
Sullivan et al (53) (1980)68 NA NRT TN 27 297 30 15 111 and 82 1 167 ± 24
Pietinen et al (54) (1979)68 NA SV DC 50 267 38 46 119 ± 10 and 77 ± 8 3 153 ± 59
Schachter et al (55) (1979)5 NA SV PA 9 NR 78 NR NR 3 117
Connor et al (56) (1978–1979)20 NA NRT OR 352 367 52 NR Men: 116 ± 10 and 75 ± 8; women: 109 ± 14 and 70 ± 9 1 Men: 168 ± 67; women: 127 ± 52
Luft et al (57) (1974–1978)21 NA NRT IN 345 307 NR NR NR 1 Whites: 153 ± 66; blacks: 136 ± 61
Kilcoyne et al (58) (1974)3522 NA NRT NY 146 487 68 100 174 ± 29 and 111 ± 13 1 128 ± 50
Gros et al (59) (1971)36 NA NRT MI 10 NR NR NR NR NR 191
Veverbrants and Arky (60) (1968)523 NA NRT MA 5 NR NR NR NR 3 73 ± 8
Dahl (61) (1957)324 NA SV NY 9 42 ± 11 0 NR NR 6–38 169 ± 34
1

NA, not applicable; PC, prospective cohort; SV, survey; NR, not reported; NRT, nonrandomized trial; NHS, Nurses' Health Study; DASH-S, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension–Sodium; RCT, randomized controlled trial; INTERMAP, International Collaborative Study on Macronutrients, Micronutrients, and Blood Pressure; CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; INTERSALT, International Cooperative Study on the Relation of Blood Pressure to Electrolyte Excretion in Populations.

2

Total of 82% of patients on diuretics.

3

All or some participants had a history of high blood pressure.

4

Mean ± SD (all such values).

5

Date of study not reported; assumed date of submission.

6

Date of study not reported; assumed date of publication.

7

Mean.

8

No antihypertensive medications used or patients were normotensive.

9

Includes participants with high blood pressure and kidney stones and taking thiazide diuretics.

10

Range (all such values).

11

During run-in period for the trial, all patients had typical US diet (customary, self-selected diet), and patients were not then taking antihypertensive medications.

12

Participants were overweight and had prehypertension but were not taking antihypertensive medications; 1138 of 1159 patients provided urine.

13

No baseline values; used values of placebo group after 4 d.

14

Data from CARDIA study referenced in Loria et al (40) article (unpublished CARDIA data, 1990).

15

Patients had prehypertension but were not taking antihypertensive medications.

16

Participants receiving usual diet and not taking antihypertensive medications.

17

Median for 24-h urinary sodium.

18

Mean values from appendix II.

19

Used data from 4-wk control period.

20

Nineteen participants were taking antihypertensive medications, but authors noted that mean urine sodium was not different when these participants were excluded.

21

Twenty-four-hour urine samples from 345 of the 347 participants.

22

Patients with renal dysfunction and high blood pressure.

23

Five study participants in the “mean control” group provided 24-h urinary sodium.

24

Used data from all subjects in the “average salt” diet group.