Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;186(2):677–686. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.117549

TABLE 3.

List of SNPs significantly associated with pitch canker resistance (α < 0.05) and their effects on genotypic (clonal) and phenotypic (lesion length) variation

SNP_ID Allele A Allele B Mean (log mm) 95% confidence interval (log mm) % phenotypic standard deviation % diff in clonal variance % σ2Phenotypic due to SNP effect in clonal variance
0_15227_01_160 T C 0.040 [0.002, 0.078] 4.775 0.924 0.236
0_15382_01_104 G A 0.061 [0.007, 0.115] 7.210 3.832 0.980
0_2234_01_128 G T 0.048 [0.009, 0.087] 5.697 1.745 0.446
0_6323_01_248 G C 0.045 [0.002, 0.088] 5.307 0.889 0.227
0_9288_01_372 A G 0.048 [0.011, 0.085] 5.662 0.288 0.074
1_3327_01_116 A G 0.054 [0.005, 0.103] 6.383 2.187 0.559
2_4484_02_622 T C 0.057 [0.004, 0.110] 6.738 1.101 0.282
2_6181_02_400 T G 0.057 [0.005, 0.110] 6.761 1.129 0.289
2_8946_02_437 G C 0.056 [0.003, 0.107] 6.560 1.031 0.264
CL4336Contig1_01_180 T C 0.053 [0.001, 0.106] 6.277 1.519 0.389

Mean SNP effects on the phenotype were estimated from the last 20,000 iterations in the BAMD program, along with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The contribution of the SNP to the phenotype is shown as the percentage of the phenotypic standard deviation, whereas genotypic effects are indicated as the percentage of difference in the clonal variance. The percentage of the phenotypic variance due to the SNP effect in clonal variance is an indicator of the genetic contribution of the SNP to the phenotype.