Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;186(2):699–712. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.118828

TABLE 1.

Interspecific hybrid zones of P. alba and P. tremula sampled in the present study

Locality Country Coordinates Geography Population N HE HO FISa As
Danube Austria 48.26°N, 16.23°E ∼90 km of river valley Hybrid zone 192 0.596 0.489 0.201 8.581
Riverine lowland forest P. alba 48 0.508 0.436 0.114 6.770
Eastern Alps P. tremula 48 0.533 0.425 0.177 6.757
Ticino Italy 45.28°N, 8.98°E ∼95 km of river valley Hybrid zone 138 0.590 0.517 0.129 6.694
Riverine lowland forest P. alba 40 0.428 0.355 0.169 4.609
Alps/Lago Maggiore P. tremula 40 0.479 0.351 0.197 5.021
Tisza Hungary 48.32°N, 22.26°E ∼85 km of river valley Hybrid zone 106 0.610 0.470 0.227 7.331
Riverine lowland forest P. alba 40 0.462 0.401 0.151 5.074
Zemplen mountains P. tremula 40 0.547 0.450 0.167 5.568

Included are coordinates and additional geographic information, number of individuals sampled (N), and the following genetic diversity summary statistics estimated from 68 mapped, codominant microsatellites: expected (HE) and observed heterozygosity (HO), inbreeding coefficient FIS, and allelic richness (As).

a

All FIS values significant at P < 0.001.