Table 1. Type I functional divergence and purifying selection analysis for all GRIN2s.
Groups | θ±SE | LRT | P | Functional distance (dF) | Qk>0.67 | Qk>0.9 |
2AB/2CD | 0.629±0.082 | 59.182 | <0.01 | 0.991 | 82 | 8 |
2A/2B | 0.223±0.115 | 3.726 | >0.05 | 0.252 | 1 | 0 |
2A/2C | 0.789±0.120 | 43.184 | <0.01 | 1.555 | 213 | 9 |
2A/2D | 0.366±0.083 | 19.412 | <0.01 | 0.455 | 7 | 2 |
2B/2C | 0.695±0.104 | 44.648 | <0.01 | 1.188 | 109 | 6 |
2B/2D | 0.474±0.125 | 14.256 | <0.01 | 0.642 | 14 | 0 |
2C/2D | 0.038±0.133 | 0.081 | >0.05 | 0.039 | 0 | 0 |
Negative site % a | Highly negative sites % b | Functional branch length (bF) | ||||
2A | 40.21 | 33.52 | 0.4426 | |||
2B | 39.33 | 31.05 | 0.3525 | |||
2C | 30.22 | 22.71 | 0.7024 | |||
2D | 19.39 | 15.44 | −0.1207 |
Functional divergence (θ) for all pairwise comparisons of the GRIN2s were shown as value±standard error, the functional distance between two groups were calculated as –Ln(1-θ), and the functional branch length (bF) of each group were estimated by the least-squares method. Two hundred and twenty-four sites were investigated based on posterior probability (Qk) within GRIN2s.
Percentages of sites under negative selection (P<0.1).
Percentages of sites under strong negative selection (P<0.05).