Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 14;5(10):e13342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013342

Table 1. Type I functional divergence and purifying selection analysis for all GRIN2s.

Groups θ±SE LRT P Functional distance (dF) Qk>0.67 Qk>0.9
2AB/2CD 0.629±0.082 59.182 <0.01 0.991 82 8
2A/2B 0.223±0.115 3.726 >0.05 0.252 1 0
2A/2C 0.789±0.120 43.184 <0.01 1.555 213 9
2A/2D 0.366±0.083 19.412 <0.01 0.455 7 2
2B/2C 0.695±0.104 44.648 <0.01 1.188 109 6
2B/2D 0.474±0.125 14.256 <0.01 0.642 14 0
2C/2D 0.038±0.133 0.081 >0.05 0.039 0 0
Negative site % a Highly negative sites % b Functional branch length (bF)
2A 40.21 33.52 0.4426
2B 39.33 31.05 0.3525
2C 30.22 22.71 0.7024
2D 19.39 15.44 −0.1207

Functional divergence (θ) for all pairwise comparisons of the GRIN2s were shown as value±standard error, the functional distance between two groups were calculated as –Ln(1-θ), and the functional branch length (bF) of each group were estimated by the least-squares method. Two hundred and twenty-four sites were investigated based on posterior probability (Qk) within GRIN2s.

a

Percentages of sites under negative selection (P<0.1).

b

Percentages of sites under strong negative selection (P<0.05).