Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2010 Sep 15;71(9):1644–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.045

Table 4.

Linear Regression Models Predicting Dental Compartment Thickness and Density—Study 2 (N = 38 children)

Enamel Thickness (N = 38) Linear Regression Models
Independent variables	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Coefficients	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t
SES	-0.02 (0.01)-2.75^**	-0.02 (0.01)-2.68^**	-0.02 (0.01)-2.43^*	-0.01 (0.01)-1.66^†
Family Financial Stressors		-0.00 (0.01)-0.05	0.00 (0.01)0.11	-0.00 (0.01)-0.27
Salivary Cortisol Reactivity			-.02 (0.01)-1.50	-0.01 (0.01)-2.39^*
SES × Salivary Cortisol Reactivity				0.02 (0.01)2.67^**
Overall F	7.59^**	3.69^*	3.30^*	4.70^**

Enamel Density (N = 38) Linear Regression Models
Independent variables	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
Coefficients	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t	B (SE)/t
SES	-12.18 (6.27)-1.94^†	-13.08 (6.43)-2.03^*	-10.60 (6.14)-1.73^†	-8.42 (6.45)-1.31
Family Financial Stressors		-4.08 (5.62)-0.73	-2.71 (5.32)-0.51	-3.56 (5.37)-0.66
Salivary Cortisol Reactivity			-14.21 (6.05)-2.35^*	-16.36 (6.35)-2.58^*
SES × Salivary Cortisol Reactivity				9.07(8.43)1.08
Overall F	3.78^†	2.13	3.45^*	2.89^*

^†

p ≤ .10

^*

p ≤ .05

^**

p ≤ .01

^***

p ≤ .001