Table 1.

Relative promoter comparison, activities of the best clones from rescreening are given in relation to the value of the WT-strain at 96 h (i.e. 100%) and the time of methanol induction—resp. time 0 h at the end of glucose batch; standard deviations were calculated using data from four different wells

Promoter	0 h	24 h	48 h	72 h	96 h
WT	8 ± 8	86 ± 14	127 ± 14	136 ± 15	100 ± 21
d1	4 ± 9	83 ± 11	86 ± 10	152 ± 15	185 ± 45
d1+	7 ± 4	172 ± 55	189 ± 61	218 ± 23	167 ± 40
d6*	−6 ± 10	124 ± 30	141 ± 39	202 ± 44	123 ± 31
Rap1_G3	77 ± 16	96 ± 22	100 ± 29	164 ± 24	80 ± 14
Rap1_A7	52 ± 10	46 ± 35	44 ± 17	−5 ± 51	49 ± 6
Rap1_C8	39 ± 8	36 ± 8	49 ± 15	172 ± 64	49 ± 5
Rap1_B3	46 ± 8	68 ± 15	96 ± 17	80 ± 45	61 ± 5