Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 27;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-59

Table 5.

Comparison of prediction performance by net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated difference improvement (IDI) with relative 95% confidence interval (CI) and significance levels

Comparison set Models NRI* 95% CI P value IDI 95% CI P value
1 Clinical coefficient-based vs. Cambridge 0.066 -0.054 - 0.186 0.28 0.007 -0.001 - 0.014 0.051
2 Biochemical coefficient-based vs. Cambridge 0.294 0.141 - 0.447 0.0004 0.021 0.004 - 0.037 0.008
3 Biochemical coefficient-based vs. clinical coefficient-based 0.244 0.122 - 0.366 0.0002 0.014 -0.002 - 0.030 0.053
4 Clinical coefficient-based vs. clinical point-based 0.090 -0.022 - 0.203 0.23 0.009 -0.001 - 0.019 0.057
5 Biochemical coefficient-based vs. biochemical point-based 0.362 0.262 - 0.462 0.0003 0.023 0.005 - 0.041 0.006
6 Biochemical point-based vs. clinical point-based -0.015 -0.139 - 0.109 0.82 0.00003 -0.001 - 0.001 0.49

*Presumed risk categories for NRI according to quartile values (0.6%, 1.2% and 2.6%)