Table 11.
Case | Control | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Population location | Year | Age | GG | AG | AA | GG | AG | AA | OR | 95%CI |
Chan, I H[16] | Hong Kong | 2008 | 10.4 ± 3.7 | 94 | 136 | 43 | 54 | 70 | 17 | 1.18 | 0.78-1.80 |
Feng, D[70] | Heilongjiang | 2009 | 3-16 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 30 | 10 | 3 | 3.80 | 1.57-9.23 |
Liu, J L[71] | Guangdong | 2004 | 14-67 | 27 | 54 | 19 | 44 | 46 | 10 | 2.12 | 1.17-3.84 |
Wu, X H[40] | Hubei | 2010 | 8.8 | 105 | 111 | 36 | 125 | 84 | 18 | 1.72 | 1.19-2.46 |
Yang, L F[72] | Gansu | 2010 | 8 ± 4 | 71 | 60 | 47 | 73 | 66 | 19 | 1.29 | 0.84-2.00 |
Zhao, K S[73] | Jilin | 2005 | 1.5-14 | 18 | 60 | 52 | 8 | 42 | 50 | 0.54 | 0.23-1.30 |
Wang, J Y[27] | Taiwan | 2009 | 7.82 ± 3.81 | 203 | 194 | 49 | 212 | 234 | 59 | 0.87 | 0.67-1.12 |
Xi, D[74] | Hubei | 2004 | ≥20 | 15 | 24 | 6 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 2.08 | 1.28-3.38 |
Xi, D[74] | Hubei | 2004 | ≥4 | 10 | 25 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 2 | 3.52 | 1.30-9.55 |