Table 4.
Case | Control | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Population location | Year | Age | AA | AG | GG | AA | AG | GG | OR | 95%CI |
Cui, T P[33] | Hubei | 2003 | 3-68 | 129 | 89 | 23 | 130 | 41 | 4 | 2.51 | 1.64-3.83 |
Deng, R Q[34] | Guangdong | 2006 | 8-75 | 26 | 42 | 32 | 15 | 38 | 47 | 0.50 | 0.25-1.02 |
Gui, Q[35] | Chongqing | 2006 | 49(28-72) | 33 | 15 | 2 | 34 | 14 | 2 | 1.09 | 0.48-2.52 |
Hu, S Y[36] | Guangdong | 2005 | 2-16 | 90 | 66 | 19 | 130 | 41 | 4 | 2.73 | 1.74-4.28 |
Liu, L N[37] | Henan | 2005 | 3-15 | 46 | 27 | 3 | 47 | 12 | 1 | 2.36 | 1.09-5.08 |
Mak, J C[38] | Hong Kong | 2007 | 42.4 ± 16.1 | 200 | 81 | 4 | 191 | 91 | 9 | 0.81 | 0.57-1.15 |
Sun, J[39] | Heilongjiang | 2010 | 3-14 | 67 | 24 | 0 | 33 | 9 | 0 | 1.31 | 0.55-3.14 |
Wu, X H[40] | Hubei | 2010 | 8.8 | 183 | 61 | 8 | 168 | 55 | 4 | 1.07 | 0.72-1.61 |
Zhang, A M[41] | Hunan | 2005 | 3-14 | 55 | 39 | 0 | 57 | 11 | 0 | 3.67 | 1.71-7.89 |
Zhang, H[42] | Shanghai | 2007 | - | 257 | 87 | 8 | 87 | 27 | 0 | 1.19 | 0.73-1.95 |
Zhang, W[43] | Singapore | 2007 | - | 115 | 30 | 0 | 115 | 38 | 4 | 0.71 | 0.42-1.22 |
Wang, J Y[27] | Taiwan | 2009 | 7.82 ± 3.81 | 326 | 112 | 9 | 360 | 140 | 12 | 0.88 | 0.66-1.17 |