Table 2.

Seed longevity-associated QTLs of seeds stored under conventional and CD conditions—low-resolution mapping

Type of seeds	Year	Type of ageing	LG	QTL	Closest marker	1–LOD interval (cM)	LOD score	R2	Additive effect	Multilocus analysis (Pr >F)
Control	2002	Conv	7	Slg7.1	LE3064	35–57	3.07	0.11	B	0.016
	2006	Conv	1	Slg1.1	LE3190	38–61	2.62	0.076	B	0.021
			4	Slg4.1	1A01-129	20–46	3.79	0.112	A
			4	Slg4.2	L317	61–118	5.95	0.192	B
	2002	CD	2	SlgCD2.1	LE7005	94–120	3.76	0.148	A
	2006	CD	1	SlgCD1.1	M1730	18–42	3.02	0.082	A	<0.0001
			3	SlgCD3.1	E35/M49-F-207	9–30	3.34	0.091	A	<0.0001
			4	SlgCD4.1	E45/M49-F-203	0–32	2.61	0.072	A	0.004
			4	SlgCD4.2	LE3042	64–87	3.90	0.11	B
			6	SlgCD6.1	E51/M49-F-206	0–18	3.60	0.103	A
Primed	2006	Conv	1	SlgP1.1	E54/M48-F-124	47–71	2.88	0.126	A	0.001
			4	SlgP4.1	LM0052	22–45	2.72	0.123	A	0.012
	2006	CD	1	SlgPCD1.1	LE0193	42–63	2.99	0.093	A	<0.0001
			2	SlgPCD2.1	E35/M59-F-234	76–100	3.95	0.136	A
			3	SlgPCD3.1	1A03-253	0–48	3.17	0.076	A
			6	SlgPCD6.1	Contig6010-1	0–18	4.11	0.138	A
			8	SlgPCD8.1	Contig15680-2	109–134	4.29	0.127	B

Low-resolution mapping was performed across all linkage groups. Seeds of the RIL populations were produced in 2002 (control) and 2006 (control and primed). Multilocus ANOVA results are shown for loci with marginally significant LOD (log of odds) scores. Additive effects were conferred by alleles from A, L. sativa; and B, L. serriola.

CD, controlled deterioration; conv, conventional; LG, linkage group; P, primed; Slg, Seed longevity.