Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug 17;68(9):801–810. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.019

Figure 1. Effect of Cacna1c HET knockout on activity and exploration.

Figure 1

(a) Male HET mice did not differ significantly from WT mice in open field locomotion. (b) In females, genotype had a significant effect on locomotion in the open field (P<0.05). Neither Male (c) nor Female (d) HET mice were significantly different than WT mice in homecage activity. (e) Male and (f) female HET mice had lower exploratory activity on the holeboard test. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *, P≤0.05.