Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;117(10):1255–1261. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02647.x

Table 3.

Effect evaluation 24 hours after randomisation

Acupuncture group (95% CI) Control group (95% CI) P-value
Delivered/in labour (primary outcome)
Total: n/n; % (95% CI) 7/60* 12% (5–23) 8/58* 14% (6–25) 0.79**
Nulliparous 3/36 8% (2–22) 3/35 9% (2–23) 1.00**
Parous 4/24 14% (5–37) 5/23 23% (8–44) 0.72**
Cervical maturity***
Cervical length <1 cm: n/n; % (95% CI) 28/55 51% (37–65) 33/51 65% (50–78) 0.17**
Cervix dilatation (cm): mean; SDn 1.5 0.8656 1.1 0.7752 0.90****
Amniotomy possible: n/n; % (95% CI) 16/60 27% (16–40) 19/58 33% (21–46) 0.55**
Nulliparous 7/36 19% (8–36) 7/35 20% (8–37) 1.00**
Parous 9/24 38% (19–59) 12/23 52% (31–73) 0.39**
Epidural
Epidural: n/n; % (95% CI) 24/60 40% (28–53) 24/57 42% (29–56) 0.85**
Nulliparous 19/36 53% (36–70) 20/34 59% (41–75) 0.64**
Parous 5/24 21% (7–42) 4/23 17% (5–39) 1.00**
Length of labour
Total (minutes): mean (95% CI) 448 (374–522) 403 (333–474) 0.38*****
First stage 390 (319–461) 357 (290–425) 0.51*****
Second stage 41 (30–52) 60 (2–118) 0.52*****
Postpartum bleeding
Postpartum bleeding >500 ml:n/n; % (95% CI) 15/59 25% (15–38) 13/55 24% (13–37) 1.00**
Stimulation of contractions
Total: n/n; % (95% CI) 26/47 55% (40–70) 22/39 56% (40–72) 1.00**
Primiparous 19/28 68% (48–84) 17/21 81% (58–95) 0.35**
Parous 7/19 37% (16–62) 5/18 28% (10–53) 0.73**
Instrumental delivery
No intervention: n; % (95% CI) 41 68% (57–80) 39 67% (55–79) 0.78******
Ventouse: n; % (95% CI) 8 13% (5–22) 8 14% (5–23)
Caesarean section: n; % (95% CI) 11 18% (9–28) 11 19% (9–29)
Neonatal outcome
Apgar ≤ 7
1 minute: n/n; % (95% CI) 8/60 13% (6–25) 6/58 10% (4–21) 0.78**
5 minutes: n/n; % (95% CI) 1/60 2% (0–9) 1/58 2% (0–9) 1.00**
Umbilical pH value
<7.2: n/n; % (95% CI) 13/44 30% (17–45) 15/48 31% (19–46) 1.00**
<7.1: n/n; % (95% CI) 2/44 5% (1–16) 3/48 6% (1–17) 1.00**
*

The difference between the total numbers of inclusions in the AG and CG (62 and 63 respectively) and the numbers analysed in each of the two groups reflect inconsistencies in reporting.

**

Two-sided Fisher’s exact test (intention-to-treat principle).

***

Includes all women who had not yet undergone delivery, including women in active labour.

****

Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

*****

Two-sample t test.

******

Pearson’s chi-square test.