Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;34(6):717–723. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.05.006

Table 3.

Frequency of Promoter Methylation by Case-Control StatusA, B

RASSF1A GSTP1 APC RARβ2 At least One
Gene
MethylatedC
Frequency % (n)
95% CI
Frequency % (n)
95% CI
Frequency % (n)
95% CI
Frequency % (n)
95% CI
Frequency % (n)
95% CI
Cases 22.0 (11/50) 4.0 (2/50) 2.0 (1/49) 6.7 (3/45) 31.8 (14/44)
10.5, 33.5 −1.4, 9.4 −1.9, 5.9 −0.6, 14.0 18.0, 45.6
BBD 22.9 (11/48) 10.4 (5/48) 4.4 (2/46) 2.3 (1/43) 38.4 (15/39)
Controls 11.0, 34.8 1.8, 19.0 −1.5, 10.3 −2.2, 6.8 24.5, 52.3
Healthy 17.2 (17/99) 7.1 (7/99) 4.2 (4/96) 1.1 (1/88) 24.4 (21/86)
Controls 9.8, 24.6 2.0, 12.2 0.2, 8.2 −1.1, 3.3 15.3, 33.5
A

Methylation Frequencies (PMR>0) by case-control status, no statistical differences were found (Conditional logistic regression).

B

7 subjects were excluded due to undetectable ACTB levels in at least one of the assays (4 BBD controls and 3 healthy controls). In the case of RARβ2 additional samples did not amplify in the first round of analysis and were not repeated due to the precious nature of the samples and the results of the completed genes indicating that the frequency of methylation did not differ between cases and controls.

C

Includes those women who had methylation measurements for all four genes