Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol Screen. 2008 Aug 27;13(8):777–784. doi: 10.1177/1087057108323125

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparisons between normalization methods. Venn diagrams representing the ratio of true positives to total positives for A. the top 5% ranked wells after background subtraction followed by quantile normalization and the top 2.5% ranked wells after cellHTS2 and B. the top 0.5% after background subtraction followed by quantile normalization and the top 0.5% after cellHTS2. Total numbers of true and false positives overlapping for each method are given to the right.