Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):313–320. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0380

Figure 2.

Figure 2

For all eyes, topical pilocarpine (A) and atropine iontophoresis (C) decreased the EW-stimulated accommodative response amplitudes to submaximal (□) and maximal (●) stimuli. For EW + pilocarpine stimulation (B), responses to maximal EW stimulation increased after the first time point and then remained constant, whereas responses to submaximal EW stimulation increased and approached the maximal responses. Responses are normalized to the pre-pilocarpine maximal EW-stimulated response for each eye. Error bars represent SEM.