Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):313–320. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0380

Figure 4.

Figure 4

There was a linear relationship between EW-stimulated response amplitude of accommodation and peak velocity for submaximal (A) and maximal (B) stimulus current amplitudes after pilocarpine instillation. When similar amplitude responses to submaximal current stimulations were considered as a function of normalized starting point, a decrease in peak velocity was observed as pilocarpine shifted the starting point to a more myopic refraction (C). When all responses to maximal current stimulations were considered, there was also a decrease in peak velocity with a myopic shift in starting point (D). Peak velocity to submaximal current stimulation correlated with total accommodation (i.e., EW + pilocarpine-stimulated responses; E) but not with maximal current stimulation (F).