Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 28;10:579. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-579

Table 4.

Comparisons of AUCs for percent body fat mass, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference, stratified by gender.

Male Female
AUC 95% CI x2 AUC 95% CI x2
ROC curve§ 14.77**a 5.55
 %FM 0.67 0.62, 0.71 0.69 0.65, 0.73
 BMI 0.62 0.57, 0.66 0.69 0.65, 0.73
 WHR 0.61 0.57, 0.66 0.65 0.61, 0.70
 WC 0.62 0.58, 0.67 0.69 0.65, 0.73
ROC curve& 7.74 6.81
 %FM 0.68 0.63, 0.72 0.71 0.67, 0.75
 BMI 0.65 0.60, 0.69 0.71 0.67, 0.75
 WHR 0.64 0.60, 0.69 0.69 0.65, 0.73
 WC 0.65 0.60, 0.69 0.71 0.67, 0.75

%FM: percent body fat mass; BMI: body mass index; WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; WC: waist circumference, AUC: area under curve.

**: p < 0.01;

a: AUC of ROC curve for %FM was significant larger than those for BMI, WHR, and WC

§: Logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol drinking and betel nut chewing

&: Logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol drinking, betel nut chewing, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension and low HDL cholesterol.