Table 2.
Comparison of PCR, HC2, and Chip methods in 25 discordant samples.
| PCR | HC2 | Chip | Sequence | False + | False - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LR | N | N | N | PCR | |
| 3 | LR | N** | N | 70 | PCR 1* | Chip |
| 4 | N | HR | N | 53 | HC2 2* | PCR/Chip |
| 5 | HR | HR | N | 66 | HC2 3* | Chip |
| 6 | HR | HR | N | 54 | PCR/HC2 | Chip |
| 7 | LR | HR | N | 11 | HC2 | Chip |
| 8 | N | HR | OTHER | 83 | HC2 4* | PCR 4* |
| 9 | N | HR | OTHER | 52 | Chip: mistyping | PCR |
| 10 | N | HR | OTHER | N | HC2/Chip | |
| 11 | N | HR | N | 39 | PCR/Chip | |
| 12 | HR | N** | 70 | 70 | PCR | |
| 13 | N | HR | 16 | 16 | PCR | |
| 14 | HR | N | 51 | 51 | HC2 | |
| 15 | HR | N** | 11 | 11 | PCR | |
| 16 | HR | N** | 70 | 70 | PCR | |
| 17 | N | HR | 16+39 | 16+39 | HC2 | |
| 18 | N | HR | 54 | 54 | HC2 5* | PCR 5* |
| 19 | N | HR | N | N | HC2 | |
| 20 | HR | HR | 70 | 70 | PCR | HC2 |
| 21 | N | HR | N | N | HC2 | |
| 22 | N | HR | other | N | HC2/Chip | |
| 23 | 18+HR | N | 18+70 | 18+70 | HC2 | |
| 24 | HR+LR | N (equivocal) | 73+43 | 73+43 | HC2 | |
| 25 | HR | N | 51 | 51 | HC2 | |
PCR (20 types; 18 HR types+2 LR types): 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, and 82 + 6 and 11
HC2: (13 HR types) 16,18,31,33,35,39,45,51,52,56,58,59, and 68
Chip (26 types; 18 HR types+8 LR types): 16,18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 69, 73, 53 and LR: 70, 6, 11, 32, 34, 40, 42, 43, 44, 54, 55, 57, 61, 62
1*: PCR LR does not cover HPV-70 type.
2*: HC2 HR does not cover HPV-53 type.
3*: HC2 HR does not cover HPV-66 type.
4*: HC2 and PCR PR do not cover HPV-83 type.
5*: PCR LR does not cover HPV-54 type.
6*: PCR LR does not cover HPV-67 type.
**: HR2 was not considered in this analysis because HR2 excludes LR HPV types.