Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 1;4(5):1205–1213. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400521

Table 3.

Median (± SEM) Percent False-Positive Detection Rates for the Identification of Insulin Secretory Bursts Using the Two Analytical Methods AutoDecon and Cluster

Sampling duration (min): 30 60 120
Analytical method: AutoDecon Cluster AutoDecon Cluster AutoDecon Cluster
Sampling frequency Replicates
Every 30 seconds Singlicates 8.9 ± 0.43 19.8 ± 0.68 6.6 ± 0.33 19.4 ± 0.47 3.9 ± 0.18 19.9 ± 032
Duplicates 8.9 ± 0.48 15.0 ± 0.61 6.4 ± 0.33 16.1 ± 0.43 4.2 ± 0.20 18.1 ± 0.33
Triplicates 8.6 ± 0.48 21.7 ± 0.61 6.2 ± 0.33 23.1 ± 0.45 3.5 ± 0.18 25.1 ± 0.31
Every 1 minute Singlicates 3.2 ± 0.31 7.1 ± 0.58 2.7 ± 0.20 6.5 ± 0.38 2.5 ± 0.16 9.2 ± 0.30
Duplicates 3.6 ± 0.30 4.3 ± 0.43 3.3 ± 0.22 16.3 ± 0.42 2.6 ± 0.15 6.2 ± 0.25
Triplicates 4.1 ± 0.32 6.2 ± 0.44 4.3 ± 0.26 6.0 ± 0.30 3.0 ± 0.16 7.1 ± 0.24
Every 2 minutes Singlicates 0.38 ± 0.19 1.3 ± 0.31 0.55 ± 0.10 2.6 ± 0.30 0.33 ± 0.06 3.4 ± 0.26
Duplicates 0.40 ± 0.16 1.2 ± 0.29 0.46 ± 0.08 1.2 ± 0.22 0.51 ± 0.01 2.0 ± 0.18
Triplicates 0.18 ± 0.11 0.92 ± 0.20 0.72 ± 0.11 1.0 ± 0.18 0.59 ± 0.01 1.4 ± 0.13