Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Nov 4;411(3-4):155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.020

Table 1.

Performance characteristics of various approaches for the evaluation of hyperprolactinemia following PEG-precipitation.

Method Sensitivity (%) 95% CI (%) Specificity (%) 95% CI (%) Efficiency * (%)
Standard reference interval (≤19 ng/mL) 59 33–81 100 72–100 77
Post-PEG modified reference range (≤13 ng/mL) 88 62–98 85 54–97 87
GFC regression estimate with use of the standard reference interval (≤19 ng/mL) 82 56–95 85 54–97 83
Post-PEG cutoff determined by ROC analysis (≤11.6 ng/mL) 94 71–99 85 55–98 90
*

Percent correctly classified ([true positives + true negatives])/total # of patients)