Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 6;299(4):H1190–H1204. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01207.2009

Table 2.

6-Keto-PGF and TXB2 production in vehicle- and GA-treated PRAs under basal and AA-stimulated conditions for piglets exposed to control and hypoxic conditions for 3 and 10 days

3-Day Control 3-Day Hypoxia 10-Day Control 10-Day Hypoxia
6-keto-PGFαproduction, pg/ml
Number of PRAs/group 7 7 8 6
Vehicle-treated PRAs
    Basal 30,963 ± 5,000 9,134 ± 1,531 6,396 ± 896 4,449 ± 896
    AA stimulation 39,617 ± 7,120* 17,766 ± 22,619* 13,771 ± 1,193* 10,295 ± 483*
GA-treated PRAs
    Basal 29,922 ± 7,078 11,373 ± 1,854 7,480 ± 666 6,396 ± 896
    AA stimulation 56,726 ± 13,315 20,971 ± 3,203 13,610 ± 1,456 13,771 ± 1,193
TXB2production, pg/ml
Number of PRAs/group 7 7 8 6
Vehicle-treated PRAs
    Basal 3.7 ± 1.0 8.2 ± 2.8 1.0 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.8
    AA stimulation 7.7 ± 1.6* 12.0 ± 2.6* 6.1 ± 1.9* 8.3 ± 2.1*
GA-treated PRAs
    Basal 3.6 ± 0.5 5.2 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.7 2.0 ± 1.0
    AA stimulation 8.0 ± 1.6 12.0 ± 2.3 5.8 ± 2.2 7.5 ± 1.5

Values are means ± SD. AA, arachidonic acid.

*

Significantly different from vehicle-treated PRAs under basal conditions (P < 0.05 by paired t-test);

different from GA-treated PRAs under basal conditions (P < 0.05 by paired t-test).