Table 2.
Porous Medium | Sn | Na | Data Source |
---|---|---|---|
Vinton Soil | 0.15 | 4 | This study |
Eustis Soil | 0.17 | 4 | This study |
Mixed sand | 0.26 | 2 | Brusseau et al. 15b |
45–50 mesh sand | 0.17 | 8 | Brusseau et al. 15b |
12–20 mesh sand | 0.29 | 6 | Dobson et al., 16 |
20–30 mesh sand | 0.28 | 5 | Dobson et al., 16 |
30–40 mesh sand | 0.27 | 6 | Dobson et al., 16 |
40–50 mesh sand | 0.28 | 5 | Dobson et al., 16 |
10–20 mesh sand | 0.12 | 1 | Cho and Annable, 11c |
20–30 mesh sand | 0.14 | 1 | Cho and Annable, 11c |
30–40 mesh sand | 0.12 | 1 | Cho and Annable, 11c |
40–60 mesh sand | 0.15 | 1 | Cho and Annable, 11c |
80–100 mesh sand | 0.16 | 1 | Cho and Annable, 11c |
40–100 mesh sand | 0.19 | 3 | Saripalli et al., 4c |
40–50 mesh sand | variable | 5 | Schaefer et al., 8d |
Sn = saturation of organic liquid
number of measurements
denoted as “UA sand data” in Figure 2
denoted as “UFL data” in Figure 2
this study was conducted using the surfactant mass balance method under drainage conditions; all other studies employed the advective tracer-test method with the organic liquid at residual saturation (imbibition conditions).