Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 4;299(4):R1097–R1105. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00549.2009

Table 3.

Serum hormone and substrate concentrations following LFD, HFD, and pair feeding of the HFD isocaloric to LFD calories

LFD
HFD
Pair-Fed HFD
OP OR OP OR OP OR
Glucose, mM
    Female* 13.6 ± 0.6 12.3 ± 0.7 15.1 ± 0.9 16.3 ± 1.1 11.2 ± 0.2 9.7 ± 0.5
    Male* 16.5 ± 0.8 13.3 ± 0.6 19.0 ± 1.6 15.0 ± 1.0
Insulin, ng/ml
    Female* 4.2 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.5 7.6 ± 0.8 3.6 ± 0.9 4.8 ± 0.5 3.7 ± 0.6
    Male 4.4 ± 1.1 3.5 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 0.9 5.3 ± 0.9
Leptin, ng/ml
    Female* 3.3 ± 1.1 1.2 ± 0.2 7.8 ± 0.9 3.4 ± 1.0 6.5 ± 1.4 1.6 ± 0.2
    Male* 5.5 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 0.3 13.4 ± 1.9 13.4 ± 1.9
Triglyceride, mg/dl
    Female 38.9 ± 17.0 64.8 ± 15.5 117.6 ± 11.9 86.1 ± 12.7 49.0 ± 10.3 27.7 ± 2.2
    Male* 257.4 ± 40.2 125.1 ± 13.7 368.1 ± 37.9 214.5 ± 17.9

Values presented are means ± SE; n = 8 rats/phenotype. Within-gender main effects are provided in the first column

*

Phenotype effect {obesity prone (OP) vs. obesity resistant (OR)}.

Diet effect (LFD vs. HFD), P < 0.05. No across- or within-phenotype differences were present for any of the parameters. Across-gender analyses were not performed. Pair feeding was not performed in male rats.