Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 19;7(10):e1000352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352

Table 5. Quality appraisal of included studies: cross-sectional studies (no control group).

Cross-Sectional Study (First Author Name) Prospective Design Response Rate >80% Confounders Controlled Selection Bias Minimized Appropriate Statistical Measures
Henderson [29] a No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Greving [30] No Yes (96%) Yes Yes Yes
Kreyenbuhl [31] Yes No (58%) No Yes Yes
de Bakker [61] No Unsure Yes Yes Yes
Steinman [62] No Yes Yes No Yes
Canli [32] Yes No (79%) No Yes Yes
Verdoux [63] Yes No (24%) Yes No Yes
Muijrers [64] Yes No (71%) Yes Yes Yes
Huang [65] No NA No No Yes
Watkins [66] Yes No (64%) Yes Yes Yes
Prosser [67] Yes No (73%) No Yes No
Caamano [68] Yes No (75%) Yes Yes Yes
Gonul [69] Yes NA Yes Unsure Yes
Mansfield [82] Yes No (6%) No No Yes
Jones [70] Yes NA No No No
Caudill [71] Yes No (28%) Yes Yes Yes
Berings [72] Yes No (28%) Yes No Yes
Lurie [73] Yes No (75–78%) Yes Yes Yes
Health Care Communications 1989a [80] No Unsure No No No
Peay [33] No No (52%–70%) Yes Yes Yes
Blondeel [81] Yes No (30%) Yes Yes Yes
Haayer [74] Yes Yes (90%) Yes No Yes
Walton [75] Yes Unsure No Yes Yes
Dajda [76] No NA No Yes Yes
Becker [77] Yes Yes (84%) Yes Yes Yes
a

Received research funding from a pharmaceutical company.