Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 19;5(10):e13485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013485

Table 5. Association between FTO genotype and prostate cancer outcomes adjusted by age and study centre.

TA vs TT AA vs TT per allele effect
Odds Ratio (95%CI) p Odds Ratio (95%CI) p Odds Ratio (95%CI) p
Cancer cases (n = 1550) vs matched controls (n = 1815) 0.96 (0.83–1.12) 0.62 0.86 (0.70–1.06) 0.16 0.94 (0.85–1.03) 0.18
Cancer cases (n = 1550) vs low PSA controls (n = 1175) 0.99 (0.83–1.17) 0.87 0.82 (0.65–1.03) 0.09 0.92 (0.82–1.03) 0.14
Cancer cases (n = 1550) vs all controls (n = 2990) 0.98 (0.85–1.12) 0.73 0.84 (0.70–1.02) 0.08 0.93 (0.85–1.02) 0.12
Low grade cancers (n = 1096) vs all controls (n = 2990) 0.94 (0.80–1.09) 0.38 0.78 (0.63–0.97) 0.02 0.90 (0.81–0.99) 0.03
Localized stage (n = 1350) vs all controls (n = 2990) 0.95 (0.83–1.10) 0.50 0.87 (0.71–1.05) 0.15 0.94 (0.85–1.03) 0.16
High grade (n = 449) vs low grade (n = 1096) 1.20 (0.94–1.54) 0.14 1.33 (0.95–1.88) 0.10 1.16 (0.99–1.37) 0.07
Advanced stage (n = 196) vs localized stage (n = 1350) 1.27 (0.91–1.77) 0.16 0.79 (0.47–1.34) 0.38 0.99 (0.79–1.23) 0.90
High grade (n = 449) vs all controls (n = 2990) 1.09 (0.87–1.36) 0.45 1.01 (0.75–1.37) 0.94 1.02 (0.89–1.18) 0.78
Advanced stage (n = 196) vs all controls (n = 2990) 1.14 (0.83–1.57) 0.40 0.68 (0.41–1.12) 0.13 0.91 (0.73–1.12) 0.36