Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2006 Sep;21(3):535–544. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.535

Table 3.

Standardized Structural Model Parameter Estimates for Predictors of Cognitive Function

Parameter Total effects Partial effects
PSS → WM −.21 −.05
PSS → PS .16 −.03
PSS → EM −.09 −.09
CES-D → WM −.20 −.04
CES-D → PS .12 −.02
CES-D → EM .06 .19
IES-Total → WM −.40** −.34**
IES-Total → PS .51** .46**
IES-Total → EM −.25** −.25*
IES-Severity → WM −.11 −.04
IES-Severity → PS −.11 −.17
IES-Severity → EM .19 .18
IES-Time → WM −.03 −.06
IES-Time → PS −.11 −.09
IES-Time → EM −.24 −.24
Age → WM −.30* −.21
Age → PS .51** .44**
Age → EM −.50** −.43**

Note. PSS =Perceived Stress Scale; WM =working memory; PS =processing speed; EM =episodic memory; CES-D =Center for Epidemiological Study—Depression scale; IES-Total =Impact of Event Scale (15-item)—Total score; IES-Severity =Impact of Event Scale—Event severity rating; IES-Time =Impact of Event Scale—Event recentness (in months).

p <.10.

*

p <.05.

**

p <.01.