Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 18;9(10):2225–2237. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900388-MCP200

Table I. Effect of cAMP, (Sp)-cAMPS, and (Rp)-cAMPS on association and dissociation rate constants for C-subunit binding to FM-R92C RIα(91–244).

k1a k−1b Kdc
m1s1 s1 m
Control 2.0 ± 012 × 107 3.8 ± 0.1 × 10−3 1.9 × 10−10
cAMP 1.7 ± 0.11 × 107 0.55 ± 0.05 3.2 × 10−8
(Rp)-cAMPS 1.9 ± 0.17 × 107 7.5 ± 0.3 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−11
(Sp)-cAMPS 1.9 ± 0.16 × 107 0.75 ± 0.02 4.0 × 10−8

a Bimolecular association rate constants determined from rapid mixing of FM-labeled RIα(91–244) mutants (100 nm) with various concentrations of C-subunit in the absence and presence of cAMP (10 μm), (Rp)-cAMPS (100 μm), or (Sp)-cAMPS (100 μm) under pseudo first-order conditions (n = 4).

b Unimolecular dissociation rate constants determined by rapidly mixing excess unlabeled RIα(91–244) with preformed RIα(91–244)·C complex (100 nm) of FM-labeled RIα(91–244) conjugates and C-subunit in the absence and presence of cAMP (10 μm), (Rp)-cAMPS (100 μm), or (Sp)-cAMPS (100 μm) (n = 3).

c Equilibrium dissociation constants determined by dividing the unimolecular dissociation by the bimolecular association rate constants.