Table 4. Summary of alternative models used when Bayesian analyses were conducted.
Paired models | Harmonic means | Bayes factors | |||
Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 0 | Model 1 | lnBF | 2lnBF |
GTR+I+G | HKY+I+G | −195500.09 | −195549.60 | 49.51 | 99.02 |
GTR+I+G | GTR+I | −195500.09 | −199297.96 | 3797.87 | 7595.74 |
GTR+I+G | GTR+G | −195500.09 | −198285.54 | 2785.45 | 5570.9 |
GTR+I+G | GTR | −195500.09 | −198299.60 | 2799.51 | 5599.02 |
HKY+I+G | HKY+I | −195549.60 | −198337.60 | 2788 | 5576 |
HKY+I+G | HKY+G | −195549.60 | −195552.34 | 2.74 | 5.48 |
HKY | JC | −198337.81 | −200525.49 | 2187.68 | 4375.36 |
Note: Bayes factor comparisons indicated that mixed models significantly outperformed homogeneous models.