Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 20;5(10):e13508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013508

Table 4. Summary of alternative models used when Bayesian analyses were conducted.

Paired models Harmonic means Bayes factors
Model 0 Model 1 Model 0 Model 1 lnBF 2lnBF
GTR+I+G HKY+I+G −195500.09 −195549.60 49.51 99.02
GTR+I+G GTR+I −195500.09 −199297.96 3797.87 7595.74
GTR+I+G GTR+G −195500.09 −198285.54 2785.45 5570.9
GTR+I+G GTR −195500.09 −198299.60 2799.51 5599.02
HKY+I+G HKY+I −195549.60 −198337.60 2788 5576
HKY+I+G HKY+G −195549.60 −195552.34 2.74 5.48
HKY JC −198337.81 −200525.49 2187.68 4375.36

Note: Bayes factor comparisons indicated that mixed models significantly outperformed homogeneous models.