Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):568–577. doi: 10.1037/a0020637

Table 2.

Means and (Standard Deviations) for Marital Satisfaction and Role Overload by Provider Role Group

Main-secondary (n = 94 couples) Coprovider (n = 32 couples) Ambivalent coprovider (n = 19 couples) Mismatched (n = 127 couples)
Satisfaction
 Wives 46.57 (8.82) 51.84 (6.41) 46.23 (7.89) 45.76 (9.56)
 Husbands 48.62 (8.39) 50.66 (7.39) 49.19 (7.97) 49.14 (7.58)
 Couple a 47.54a (6.91) 51.37b (5.73) 47.71a,b (6.68) 47.45a (7.55)
 H –W b 1.97 (10.31) −1.43 (7.79) 2.96 (8.55) 3.38 (8.36)
Role Overload
 Wives 44.61 (7.74) 45.81 (6.85) 47.72 (7.65) 46.06 (8.24)
 Husbands 41.82 (8.92) 42.09 (8.77) 37.40 (8.68) 42.01 (7.73)
 Couple a 43.21 (6.65) 43.95 (5.76) 42.56 (6.24) 44.03 (6.13)
 H –W b −2.79a (10.11) −3.72a (10.71) −10.32b (10.58) −4.05a (10.25)

Note. Because no effects for time emerged, all scores for husbands and wives are averaged across the 3 points of measurement for ease of presentation. Group differences for significant effects determined by the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR are indicated by means in the same row that do not share subscripts.

a

Scores represent the average of husbands’ and wives’ reports.

b

Scores represent husbands’ –wives’ difference.