Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Microvasc Res. 2010 Jun 21;80(3):394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2010.06.005

Table 1.

Statistics of vessel diameters and curve fits determining the boundary of the glycocalyx and the diffusion coefficient of FITC

Treatment: Control Heparinase Chondroitinase Hyaluronidase Enzyme
mix
fMLP
(A) BS1 Cleavage
assay
N 12 8 8 12 11
Diameter (μm) 42.6
± 6.19
45.4
± 8.1
47.2
± 8.3
44.6
± 7.1
42.
1 ± 11.4
(B) Sigmoidal fits
of FITC-Dx70
radial intensity *
N 77 14 17 16 17 13
Diameter (μm) 38.3
± 7.58
37.8
± 10.3
40.0
± 8.5
39.9
± 6.2
36.9
± 5.7
36.2
± 5.2
(C) Intensity-
distance-time fits
for diffusion
coefficient
calculation
N 10 7 7 8 9
Diameter (μm) 25.5
±5.9
27.7
± 8.1
38.3
± 10.8
35.7
± 13.3
27.4
± 7.4
RMS error (%)
DDx70
35.0
± 0.9
33.8
± 0.2%
33.9
± 0.2
34.5
± 0.6
34.2
± 0.4
RMS error (%)
D173
33.7
±0.2%
33.6
±0.1%
33.5
±0.1%
33.8
±0.2%
33.7
±0.2%

Data are Mean ± SD

In each case, all treatments were not statistically significant from control for diameter and goodness of of of fit.

*

For all sigmoidal fits, R2=0.9998±0.0001 SD