Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Med Decis Making. 2009 Jun 18;30(2):258–266. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09337791

Table 2.

Modeling results.

N-n
ROC
N-n
Wald
stat
LR ROC N-n
Wald
stat
Both:
ROC
Both:
Wald
stat
N-n
add?
LR
add?
HRC 0.71 134 0.74 105 0.74 137 * *
WBC 0.57 12 0.53 3.1 0.58 15 *
I:T ratio 0.67 58 0.69 60 0.70 74 * *
platelet count 0.61 33 0.62 55 0.63 58 *
glucose 0.51 0.4 0.54 3.5 0.54 3.8
pCO2 0.56 5.5 0.58 5.8 0.58 6.9 *
pH 0.57 6.3 0.58 6.2 0.59 9.6 *
HCO3 0.53 0.9 0.58 9.0 0.60 15 * *
Combined model 0.85 317 0.87 311 0.87 472 * *
Optimal model 0.86 358 0.87 319 0.88 480 * *

N-n = nearest-neighbor analysis; LR = logistic regression; both = bivariable regression model using results of nearest-neighbor analysis and multivariable logistic regression models; ROC = receiver-operating characteristic area; Wald stat = Wald statistic; HRC = heart rate characteristics; WBC = white blood cell count; I:T ratio = ratio of immature to total white blood cell forms; N-n add * = nearest-neighbor model added significant information to logistic regression model (p<0.05); LR add * = logistic regression model added significant information to nearest-neighbor model (p<0.05).