Potential Client Measures | |||
---|---|---|---|
Client Characteristics | Process of Depression Care | Outcomes of Care | |
Sociodemographics (0) | Assessment a | *Depression diagnosis (0) | |
Insurance status (0,6,12,24) | *Current symptoms | *Depressive symptoms (0,6,12,24) | |
Family members (0,6, 12,24) | Previous episodes | Household or work productivity (0,6,12,24) | |
†Physical comorbidities | *Suicidal ideation | *Physical and Emotional functioning | |
†Psychiatric comorbidities | *Substance use | (0,6,12,24) | |
†Lifetime schizophrenia, †hospitalization for psychosis(0) | *Probable depression (0,6,12,24) | ||
† One year | Treatment | Treatment compliance (0,6,12,24) | |
PTSD screener (0) | *Use of psychotropic medications (0,6,12,24) | Satisfaction with treatment (6,12,24) | |
Panic screener (0, 6, 12,24) | Treatment at index visit (0) | *Unmet Need (6,12,24) | |
Alcohol screener (0, 6, 12,24) | *Primary care counseling (0,6,12,24) | ||
Use of illicit substances (0) | *Specialty care referral and | ||
Stressful life events (0,6, 12,24) | counseling (0,6,12,24) | ||
Social supports (0) | Prior treatment (0) | ||
Active/passive coping (0,6, 12,24) | |||
Ethnicity/acculturation (0) | |||
Depression knowledge (0,6) | |||
Stigma concerns (0) | |||
Treatment Preferences (0,6) | |||
Readiness for treatment (0) | |||
Organizational Measures (baseline,1st, 2nd, 3rd follow-up administrator/clinician surveys as indicated below) | |||
Organizational Background | Services | Resources | Inter-Agency Linkages & Partnerships |
Structure & Capacity | |||
*Organization typea | *Services offeredc | *Fundingc | *Inter-agency linkages d |
*Ownership/legal statusa | *Client size and compositionc | Staffing levelsc | Experiences & interest in partneringd |
Organizational structurea | *Staff qualifications for depression cared | Physical space Information technologyc | Perceived barriers to partneringd |
Organizational | *Experience with depression QI interventionsc | ||
Culture & Climate | |||
*Mission and prioritiesb | |||
Receptivity to innovationb | |||
Support for QIb & *PIC/WE Care interventionsd | |||
Implementation Measures | |||
Group dynamics of partnership | Exposure to training materials and roles | ||
*Perceived level of participation | *Implementation activities | ||
Communication & decision-making process | *Model adaptation | ||
*Perceived level of trust | *Clinical use of PIC/WE Care | ||
Intermediate partnership effectiveness | *Perceptions of PIC/WE Care interventions | ||
Perceived accomplishments | Expansion of implementation/intent to spread | ||
*Perceived empowerment & ownership | |||
*Network development | |||
Provider Measures and Timeframe (baseline-0, 12,24,36-month follow-up) | |||
Occupation background (0) | *Depression treatment practices (0, 12, 24, 36) | Depression treatment proclivity (0,12,24,36) | |
Demographics: Age, gender, ethnicity (0) | *Depression treatment knowledge (0, 12,24,36) | Readiness to change (0, 12, 24, 36) | |
Workload (0) | Quality improvement experience (0, 12,24,36) | Perceived barriers to treatment (0, 12, 24, 36) | |
Skill level with depression services (0, 12,24,36) | Satisfaction with work environment (0, 12, 24 36) |
Indicates priority measures.
0=baseline or screening, 6 or 12 = followup month.
available from CPI study or agency recruitment phase and highly stable;
assessed at baseline only and highly stable;
assessed at baseline, moderately stable and updated at baseline and 3rd follow-up.
assessed at all waves and related to implementation measures