Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Aug 18;54(1):417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.019

Table 1.

Nine pre-defined regions of interest (ROI) to test three hypotheses: separated contrasts were performed under each subheading.

Anatomic location (BA) Centroid coordinates (mm)
Reference
X Y Z
H1: cerebellum HVI and crus I & II would be preferentially engaged for symbolically cued learning
Cerebellum (lobule HVI) −8 −72 −20 Balsters & Ramnani 2008
Cerebellum (lobule HVI/crus I & II 39 −62 −31 Balsters & Ramnani 2008
L Medial superior frontal gyrus (pre-SMA, 6) −2 6 62 Balsters & Ramnani 2008
L Superior frontal gyrus (pre-motor, 6) −30 −2 66
H2: DLPFC would be specifically engaged for spatially cued learning
R Dorsal Prefrontal cortex (9) 36 39 31 Schwarb & Schumacher 2009
H3: sensorimotor cortex, SMA, putamen and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) would be activated for sequence learning across all experimental conditions
L Precentral Gyrus (M1, 4) −30 −13 45 Seidler et al., 2005
L Medial Frontal Gyrus (SMA, 6) −1 1 57 Grafton et al. 1995
L Putamen −27 −15 12 Grafton et al. 1995
L inferior parietal lobule (40) −31 −52 40 Grafton et al. 1998