Table 1.
Nine pre-defined regions of interest (ROI) to test three hypotheses: separated contrasts were performed under each subheading.
Anatomic location (BA) | Centroid coordinates (mm) |
Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X | Y | Z | ||
H1: cerebellum HVI and crus I & II would be preferentially engaged for symbolically cued learning | ||||
Cerebellum (lobule HVI) | −8 | −72 | −20 | Balsters & Ramnani 2008 |
Cerebellum (lobule HVI/crus I & II | 39 | −62 | −31 | Balsters & Ramnani 2008 |
L Medial superior frontal gyrus (pre-SMA, 6) | −2 | 6 | 62 | Balsters & Ramnani 2008 |
L Superior frontal gyrus (pre-motor, 6) | −30 | −2 | 66 | |
H2: DLPFC would be specifically engaged for spatially cued learning | ||||
R Dorsal Prefrontal cortex (9) | 36 | 39 | 31 | Schwarb & Schumacher 2009 |
H3: sensorimotor cortex, SMA, putamen and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) would be activated for sequence learning across all experimental conditions | ||||
L Precentral Gyrus (M1, 4) | −30 | −13 | 45 | Seidler et al., 2005 |
L Medial Frontal Gyrus (SMA, 6) | −1 | 1 | 57 | Grafton et al. 1995 |
L Putamen | −27 | −15 | 12 | Grafton et al. 1995 |
L inferior parietal lobule (40) | −31 | −52 | 40 | Grafton et al. 1998 |