Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Oct 14;51(10):1138–1146. doi: 10.1086/656742

Table 2. Potential predictors of levels of antibody to LukF and LukS.

Antibody to LukF Antibody to LukS
Mean antibody to LukF (ng/mL)
(SEM)a
Mean antibody to LukS (ng/mL)
(SEM)
Predictor Univariate
p-value
Multivariate
p-value
Univariate
p-value
Multivariate
p-value
Age - 0.064 0.052 - 0.013 0.021
Day of Illness - 0.700 0.472 - 0.937 0.409
Prior MRSA or
SSTI
0.036 0.011 0.006 0.002
Yes 25,598
(9,050)
13,426
(4,465)
No 12,415
(7,908)
10,242
(6,639)
Unknown 28,254
(25,050)
35,076
(28,597)
MRSA/SSTI
Contact
0.295 - 0.222 -
Yes 17,238
(9,367)
8,613
(4,495)
No 17,723
(12,463)
15,128
(10,455)
Unknown 19,335
(7,669)
14,556
(6,430)
Disease
Category
0.229 0.534
SSTI 12,444
(3,839)
6,736
(1,950)
0.829 0.687
Invasive 28,986
(15,025)
25,379
(12,500)
PVL 0.058 0.074 0.515 0.236
Positive 21,562
(7,264)
15,642
(5,794)
Negative 5,753
(3,520)
4,285
(1,944)
I

Standard error of the mean

p-value calculated using logistic regression with single variable.

p-value calculated using logistic regression controlling for age, day of illness, prior MRSA or SSTI, disease category and PVL status of isolate