Table 4.
X1 ~ Weibull(2,1), | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | Cen1% | Cen2% | Prop. of rejection | Prop. of rejection | Prop. of rejection | |
Proposed test | Truncation logrank | Standard Logrank | ||||
|
TLT | TLR | ||||
A1 ~ Exponential(1/10), A2 ~ Exponential(1/10) | ||||||
No censoring | ||||||
1 | 0% | 0% | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.049 | |
1.2 | 0% | 0% | 0.356 | 0.233 | 0.353 | |
1.4 | 0% | 0% | 0.820 | 0.648 | 0.829 | |
0.8 | 0% | 0% | 0.461 | 0.318 | 0.452 | |
0.6 | 0% | 0% | 0.990 | 0.941 | 0.989 | |
Same censoring distributions SC1 = SC2 | ||||||
1 | 20% | 20% | 0.050 | 0.049 | 0.052 | |
1.2 | 20% | 19% | 0.295 | 0.194 | 0.291 | |
1.4 | 20% | 17% | 0.735 | 0.521 | 0.732 | |
0.8 | 20% | 23% | 0.419 | 0.263 | 0.410 | |
0.6 | 20% | 26% | 0.982 | 0.865 | 0.983 | |
1 | 40% | 40% | 0.051 | 0.052 | 0.053 | |
1.2 | 40% | 37% | 0.252 | 0.146 | 0.237 | |
1.4 | 40% | 34% | 0.698 | 0.454 | 0.685 | |
0.8 | 40% | 44% | 0.366 | 0.223 | 0.366 | |
0.6 | 40% | 49% | 0.946 | 0.721 | 0.937 | |
A1 ~ Uniform(0, 20), A2 ~ Exponential(1/10) | ||||||
No censoring | ||||||
1 | 0% | 0% | 0.054 | 0.048 | 0.056 | |
1.2 | 0% | 0% | 0.267 | 0.242 | 0.265 | |
1.4 | 0% | 0% | 0.763 | 0.649 | 0.775 | |
0.8 | 0% | 0% | 0.572 | 0.316 | 0.567 | |
0.6 | 0% | 0% | 0.999 | 0.928 | 0.998 | |
Same censoring distributions SC1 = SC2 | ||||||
1 | 20% | 20% | 0.055 | 0.052 | 0.058 | |
1.2 | 20% | 19% | 0.244 | 0.199 | 0.242 | |
1.4 | 20% | 17% | 0.702 | 0.568 | 0.700 | |
0.8 | 20% | 23% | 0.504 | 0.278 | 0.495 | |
0.6 | 20% | 26% | 0.984 | 0.862 | 0.979 | |
1 | 40% | 40% | 0.056 | 0.053 | 0.055 | |
1.2 | 40% | 37% | 0.212 | 0.176 | 0.220 | |
1.4 | 40% | 34% | 0.631 | 0.460 | 0.624 | |
0.8 | 40% | 44% | 0.422 | 0.199 | 0.400 | |
0.6 | 40% | 49% | 0.969 | 0.739 | 0.959 |