Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;12(11):1564–1570. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq329

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Inclusion criteria Patients (n) ICD (n) Follow-up (months) Main result
MADIT, 1996 EF ≤0.35; MI ≥3 weeks before entry; NSVT; NYHA I–III 196 95 27 ICD therapy resulted in 54% RR reduction, P = 0.009
CABG Patch, 1997 EF ≤0.35; abnormal SAECG, scheduled for CABG; NYHA I–III 900 446 32 ICD therapy did not reduce mortality, P = 0.64
CAT, 2002 EF ≤0.30; new onset DCM; NYHA II–III 104 50 66 ICD therapy did not reduce mortality, P = 0.55
MADIT II, 2002 EF ≤0.30; MI ≥1 month before entry; NYHA I–III 1232 742 20 ICD therapy resulted in 31% RR reduction, P = 0.016
AMIOVIRT, 2003 EF ≤0.35; DCM; asymptomatic NSVT; NYHA I–III 103 51 36 ICD therapy did not reduce mortality, P = 0.80
DEFINITE, 2004 EF ≤0.35; DCM; NSVT, NYHA I–III 458 229 29 ICD therapy resulted in 35% RR reduction, P = 0.08
DINAMIT, 2004 EF ≤0.35; within 6–40 days of MI; NYHA I–III; abnormal HRV 674 332 33 ICD therapy did not reduce mortality, P = 0.66
SCD-HeFT, 2005 EF ≤0.35; 3 months optimal medical therapy; NYHA II–III 2521 829 45.5a ICD therapy resulted in 23% RR reduction, P = 0.007

AMIOVIRT, Amiodarone vs. Implantable Defibrillator Randomized Trial; CABG Patch, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patch trial; CAT, Cardiomyopathy Trial; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; DEFINITE, Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation; DINAMIT, Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial; EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HRV, heart rate variability; MADIT, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial; MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; SAECG, signal-averaged ECG; SCD-HeFT, Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.

aMedian