Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2010 Sep 8;1361:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.003

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of written sentence context (informative or ambiguous) on perceptions of subsequently heard sentences. (Left) The proportion of trials in which participants reported hearing an intact sentence (i.e., not missing any phonemes). (Right) The proportion of perceived-intact sentences for which participants reported hearing the word that was implied by the informative context (as opposed to the word that was actually spoken). All error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals derived via the bias corrected and accelerated bootstrap (10,000 bootstrap resamples).