Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Theor Biol. 2010 Aug 10;267(3):454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.07.041

Table 1.

Parameters used to solve Equations (5)(8). The carrying capacities of normal and tumour cells (K1,2 respectively), growth rates (r1,2), tumour diffusion (D2), and vascular evacuation (dv) parameters were taken from a previous acid-invasion modelling and experimental study by Gatenby et al. (2006). The diffusion of protons occurs in association with mobile buffer species to ensure charge balance, and the effective diffusion coefficient value used was estimated in Gatenby et al. (2006). From these values, Gatenby et al. (2006) calculate the tumour acid production rate (r3), and a range of values for the normal cell death rate from acid (d1) from which we select. The blood convection rate (U) is determined from the experimental values found in venules (Jain, 2001, Torchilin, 2006). The blood buffering and proportional delivery of buffer from the bloodstream to the tissue is estimated from extensive systemic buffering simulations (Martin et al., A Mathematical Model of Tumour and Blood pH, Submitted). For the increased vascular permeability simulations, we use ν2 which is increased two-fold from the baseline value of vessel permeability, ν1.

Parameter Definition Dimensions Value Source
K1 N1 carrying capacity cells/cm3 5 × 108 Gatenby et al. (2006)
K2 N2 carrying capacity cells/cm3 5 × 108 Gatenby et al. (2006)
r1 N1 growth rate 1/s 2 × 10−6 Gatenby et al. (2006)
r2 N2 growth rate 1/s 3.2 × 10−6 Gatenby et al. (2006)
D2 N2 diffusion cm2/s 2 × 10−10 Gatenby et al. (2006)
D3 Lactic acid diffusion cm2/s 5 × 10−6 Gatenby et al. (2006)
r3 H+ ion production rate M · cm3/[s · cell] 1.1 × 10−17 fit to Gatenby et al. (2006)
dv Normal vascular evacuation 1/s 1.1 × 10−4 –2.4 × 10−2 Gatenby and Gawlinski (1996), Gatenby et al. (2006)
d1 N1 death rate from acid cells/[M· s] 0 – 10 Gatenby and Gawlinski (1996)
U blood advection cm/s 5 × 10−2 Jain (2001), Torchilin (2006)
κ2 Proportional delivery buffer - 0.25 estimated
δ6 g2/r1 - 8 × 104 estimated
ρ1
d1r3K2/r12
- 3 × 104 selected from range above
δ2 r2/r1 - 1.6 from above
α2 D2/D3 - 4 × 10−5 from above
σ
Ur1/r1D3
- 1.6 × 104 from above
ν1 dv/r1 - 1.2 × 103 from above
ν2 dv/r1 - 1.2 × 105 increased two-fold from normal