Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2010 Oct;3(5):273–279. doi: 10.1002/aur.153

Table 2.

Activation differences between groups for the EFT-Fixation contrast.

Location of peak activation Cluster Size t(24) MNI Coordinates
x y z
Areas in which autism participants showed more activation than control participants

L postcentral, superior parietal and inferior parietal 215 3.88 -44 -38 64
R superior parietal, precuneus and inferior parietal 93 3.68 20 -50 54
R postcentral, superior parietal and inferior parietal 136 3.56 28 -40 56
L superior parietal, precuneus and inferior parietal 38 3.32 -18 -56 58
R superior occipital, middle occipital and cuneus 17 3.25 26 -100 12
MNI Coordinates
Location of peak activation Cluster Size t(24) x y z

Areas in which autism participants showed less activation than control participants

L superior frontal and superior medial frontal 61 3.98 -8 42 38
L middle frontal and precentral 95 3.83 -30 14 46
L thalamus and putamen 91 3.83 -20 -12 2
L supramarginal and inferior parietal 48 3.76 -62 -34 40
L inferior parietal and angular 167 3.69 -42 -48 46

Note: The threshold for activation was p < .005 with a spatial extent of 10 voxels, uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Region labels apply to the entire cluster. MNI coordinates and t-values are given for the peak activated voxel in each cluster.