Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jul 23;28(9):1335–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.04.001

Table 3.

Comparison of the Fractional Anisotropy from Nonlinear Estimation

cond6 cond* dsm dualgr icosa jones6 muthup tetra
Non–optimal Schemes from [7]
V !–! 0.0934±0.0303 0.0653±0.0219 0.149±0.0314 0.624±0.0423 0.0724±0.0189 0.0763±0.0214 !–!
FA NoCroT 0.171± 0.11 0.0634±0.0228 0.0499±0.0169 0.0501±0.0169 0.0988±0.0574 0.0469±0.0153 0.0474±0.0158 0.1±0.0518
VD 0.163±0.105 0.0605±0.0218 0.0476±0.0161 0.0478±0.0161 0.0944±0.0548 0.0448±0.0146 0.0453±0.0151 0.0954±0.0495
Optimal Schemes from [8]
V !–! 0.109±0.0407 0.0612±0.021 0.0759±0.0282 0.161±0.044 0.058±0.0193 0.0589±0.0195 !–!
FA NoCroT 0.137±0.0715 0.0662±0.024 0.051±0.0168 0.068±0.0237 0.0763±0.0294 0.0505±0.0172 0.05±0.0163 0.138±0.0647
VD 0.129±0.068 0.0646±0.0234 0.0488±0.0162 0.0662±0.0231 0.0716±0.0285 0.0474±0.0161 0.048±0.0157 0.135±0.0633
100×(FARegFAOpt)FAReg
V !–! −16.70 6.28 49.06 74.20 19.89 22.80 !–!
NoCroT 19.88 −4.42 −2.204 −35.73 22.77 −7.68 −5.49 −38.00
VD 20.86 −6.78 −2.52 −38.49 24.15 −5.804 −5.96 −41.51