Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jul 23;28(9):1335–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.04.001

Table 4.

Comparison of the Model Matching Error from Least Squares Estimation [8]

cond6 cond* dsm dualgr icosa jones6 muthup tetra
Non–optimal Schemes from [7]
V 1148±81.17 1102±64.12 1060±66.92 1042±63.21 975.1±66.1 1074±68.68 1070±64.76 852.3±62.1
χ~ NoCroT 635.3±63.11 595.1±53.39 564.6±54.83 571.3±51.98 577.7±55.07 572.5±54.1 573.9±52.26 651.8±56.28
VD 635.3±63.11 595.1±53.39 564.6±54.83 571.3±51.98 577.7±55.07 572.5±54.1 573.9±52.26 651.8±56.28
Optimal Schemes from [8]
V 791±60 697±55.4 966±64.8 559±52.1 1050±76.5 946±62.9 886±58.6 411±53.4
χ~ NoCroT 438±51.2 387±50.4 510±54.4 305±48.5 537±58.1 502±53.6 470±50.7 244±47.6
VD 438±51.2 387±50.4 510±54.4 305±48.5 537±58.1 502±53.6 470±50.7 244±47.6
100×(χ~Regχ~Opt)χ~Reg
V 31.10 36.75 8.87 46.35 −7.68 11.91 17.20 51.78
NoCroT 31.06 34.97 9.67 46.61 7.045 12.31 18.10 62.56
VD 31.06 34.97 9.67 46.61 7.045 12.31 18.10 62.56