Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;12(6):771–779. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090169

Table 2.

MicroRNAs that Were Differentially Expressed between MPM and Non-RCC Carcinoma or RCC

Median values
MPM versus non-RCC carcinoma (Adeno.)
MPM versus RCC
miR name MPM Adeno RCC P value Fold-change AUC P value Fold-change AUC
hsa-miR-200c 590 30000 1500 2.6E-20 50.3 0.99 5.2E-02 2.5 0.75
hsa-miR-141 260 25000 990 2.9E-20 96.6 0.99 6.7E-02 3.8 0.75
hsa-miR-200b 550 21000 5000 2.0E-16 38.4 0.98 7.0E-05 9.2 0.92
hsa-miR-200a 880 15000 4400 6.7E-12 16.8 0.98 4.6E-04 5 0.89
hsa-miR-429 73 980 200 2.7E-09 13.3 0.97 4.7E-03 2.7 0.86
hsa-miR-193a-3p 6100 1500 3000 3.9E-05 4.2 0.91 6.3E-03 2.1 0.80
hsa-miR-152 2200 910 1600 3.5E-03 2.4 0.89 2.9E-01 1.4 0.64
hsa-miR-193b 4300 1500 2500 2.1E-03 2.9 0.85 1.2E-01 1.7 0.72
hsa-miR-193a-5p 2000 380 540 2.5E-05 5.3 0.83 6.8E-02 3.7 0.73
hsa-miR-375 120 960 82 7.0E-03 7.8 0.82 4.4E-01 1.5 0.63
hsa-miR-194 280 1900 2400 7.9E-03 6.8 0.81 3.3E-04 8.6 0.94
hsa-miR-221 19000 12000 7800 3.9E-03 1.6 0.79 5.2E-03 2.5 0.88
hsa-miR-192 410 1800 3000 1.8E-02 4.5 0.76 1.1E-03 7.4 0.91
hsa-miR-494 3100 1600 1300 2.8E-02 2 0.76 1.2E-02 2.4 0.8
hsa-miR-143 7400 13000 17000 4.8E-02 1.8 0.74 1.6E-03 2.3 0.92
hsa-miR-130a 10000 3500 5200 4.7E-02 2.9 0.73 9.2E-02 1.9 0.75
hsa-miR-30 days 8800 12000 20000 1.1E-01 1.4 0.67 1.3E-04 2.2 0.94
hsa-miR-497 1300 2600 5500 2.1E-01 2 0.64 9.0E-03 4.3 0.85
hsa-miR-210 5900 4000 13000 2.9E-01 1.5 0.61 3.0E-03 2.2 0.88
hsa-miR-30a 7400 6100 16000 4.6E-01 1.2 0.58 5.4E-04 2.2 0.93
hsa-miR-486-5p 500 590 1600 4.3E-01 1.2 0.56 4.2E-03 3.2 0.84
hsa-miR-451 1300 1200 2900 8.1E-01 1.1 0.51 2.7E-02 2.2 0.80
hsa-miR-10b 350 300 1200 8.3E-01 1.2 0.5 2.3E-02 3.4 0.85
hsa-miR-126 4300 5100 15000 7.8E-01 1.2 0.49 3.7E-03 3.5 0.87

Median values of normalized fluorescence (rounded to two significant digits) in MPM, non-RCC carcinoma (all Adeno. in this set), and RCC samples are shown for microRNAs that were differentially expressed between MPM and either non-RCC carcinoma or RCC, as measured on the microarray platform. A Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.2 was used to identify differentially expressed microRNAs, resulting in P value cutoffs of 0.05 and 0.04 for adenocarcinoma and RCC, respectively. For each of the two comparisons, P values are shown (two-sided unpaired t-test), fold-change of median expression (either up-regulated or down-regulated, as is evident from the median values), and AUC, which is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, indicative of the classification potential of each microRNA. MicroRNAs are sorted by decreasing values of the AUC of the comparison from MPM versus non-RCC carcinoma.