Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 17;27(9-10):549–554. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9452-1

Table 2.

Comparison between slow freezing and vitrification after embryo thaw and transfer

Group A (Slow cooling) Group B (Vitrification) Significance (P value) a
Patients (% of fresh cycles) 48 (35.3%) 51 (40.4%) N/A
Mean age of thaw cycles 31.5 ± 2.4 32.0 ± 1.6 0.86
Number of embryos thawed (mean ± sd/patient, range) 162 (3.6 ± 2.4, 1–5) 158 (2.9 ± 1.1, 1–5) 0.79
Number surviving thaw (%) 141 (87.0%) 147 (93.1%) 0.89
Number of partially lysed embryos 66 (46.8%) 25 (17.0%) 0.00
Average number of blastomeres post-thaw (range) 5.3 ± 2.1 (1–8) 7.2 ± 1.1 (5–8) 0.0001
Number of transfers 48 51 N/A
Number of transferred embryos (Mean ± sd, range) 141 (2.9 ± 1.6, 1–5) 147 (2.9 ± 1.1, 1–5) 1.0
Number of clinical pregnancies (% pregnancies/transfer) 17 (35.4%) 18 (35.3%) 0.16
Number of fhb’sb (Implantation rate) 19 (13.5%) 21 (14.3%) 0.23
Pregnancies to term 17 17 N/A
Liveborn babies (% embryos implanted) 17 (89.5%) 19 (90.5%) N/A
Mean gestational age at birth (weeks) 37.0 ± 1.0 37.3 ± 1.0

Data is presented as actual figures. Percentages are presented in parentheses where necessary. Mean ± sd is presented where necessary. Significance is calculated with Students t-test for means ± sd or 2-tailed z-test to examine the differences between proportions. aP-values < 0.05 are considered significant. bFoetal heart beats. N/A—not applicable