Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 28;22(9):3118–3129. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.078493

Table 1.

The Effects of LHS, mom1, and ddm1 on the Transcriptional Activity of Repeats after 0, 2, and 7 d of Recovery

Transcriptional Fold Changesa
Wild-Type LHSb
mom1
ddm1
Target ORF R0 R2 R7 Mock LHS R0 Mock LHS R0
COPIA78 Multiple +++ +++ +++ 0 +++ 0 +++
GUS (L5) +++ ++ + +++ +++ +++ +++
TSI Multiple +++ + + +++ +++ +++ +++
IG/LINE At5g27845 +++ ++ 0 ++ +++ 0 +++
soloLTR +++ + 0 +++ +++ 0 +++
MULE2 At2g15800 +++ 0 0 +++ +++ +++ +++
ATHILA Multiple ++ + 0 ++ ++ +++ +++
HPT (A-line) ++ 0 0 + n.d. +++ n.d.
180-bp Multiple ++ 0 0 + ++ +++ +++
CYP40 At2g15790 + 0 0 + + + +
ATLANTYS2A At3g60930 + 0 0 0 + + ++
IS112A At5g35490 + ++ + +
COPIA4I At4g16870 c 0 - - + ++
TA11 At1g72920 0 + 0 - 0 0
GP2NLTR At2g15040 0 + 0 - 0 0

R, recovery; ORF, open reading frame; n.d., not determined.

a

qRT-PCR data: +++, >400; ++, 40 to 400; +, 4 to 40; 0, −2 to 4; -, −4 to −2; −, −8 to −4.

b

Two different wild types (WT and WT2) were included to match the different mutants as closely as possible. Unless stated otherwise, expression of the target did not differ significantly, and they are shown together.

c

−2 to 4 for WT2.