Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2010 Jun 11;127(1-3):144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.013

Table 2.

Correlation between visual contrast detection threshold and neuropsychological measures

Temporal Frequency PASAT
(n=18)
WAIS-R
Vocab
(n=18)
WAIS-R
Block
(n=18)
Trails A
(n=18)
Trails B
(n=18)
0 Hz
Pearson Correlation −.338 .233 .076 .422 .313
Sig. (2-tailed) .170 .352 .766 .081 .206
1 Hz
Pearson Correlation −.315 .290 −.521* .638** .300
Sig. (2-tailed) .203 .244 .027 .004 .227
5 Hz
Pearson Correlation −.075 .326 −.464 .414 .141
Sig. (2-tailed) .766 .187 .053 .088 .577
10 Hz
Pearson Correlation .165 .237 −.107 .173 −.048
Sig. (2-tailed) .513 .344 .672 .493 .850
15 Hz
Pearson Correlation −.278 −.016 .160 .496* .123
Sig. (2-tailed) .264 .951 .527 .036 .627
Mean
Pearson Correlation −.302 .223 −.116 −.619** .244
Sig. (2-tailed) .224 .374 .646 .006 .329
*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).