Table 7. .
Region and author | Year of diagnosis | Disease diagnosis | No. of cases/controls | Exposure measurements | Ages | Results | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China, Shanghai: Yang et al (2008) | 2006–2007 | Acute childhood leukaemia | 123/NA | Transformers or power lines within 50 m | 0–15 | COR=4.39 (95% CI 1.42–13.54) for interaction of XRCC1 Ex9þ16A gene and a residency within 50 m of power line/transformer | Case-only study |
Cuba: Perez et al (2005) | 1996–2000 | Acute childhood leukaemia | NA | SM in each room and outside | 0–15 | OR=1.2 (median exposure) OR=6.72 (for 0.5 μT) OR=45.15 (for 1 μT) | Methods unclear and problematic |
Iran: Feizi and Arabi (2007) | 1998–2004 | Acute childhood leukaemia | 60/59 | Distance CF | 0–15 | Distance: OR=8.76, (95% CI 1.74–58.4) Calculated fields: OR=3.60, (95% CI 1.11–12.4) | Hospital based Problematic magnetic fields calculations |
Mexico City: Mejia-Arangure et al (2007) | 1995–2003 | Acute childhood leukaemia | 42/124 | SM distance | 0–16 | OR=4.1 (95% CI 1.05–13) for ⩾0.6 μT vs ⩽0.1 μT) | Included only children with Down's syndrome |
Malaysia: Abdul Rahman et al (2008) | 2001–2007 | Acute childhood leukaemia | 128/128 | Distance | 0–14 | OR=2.3 (95% CI 1.18–4.49) for ⩽200 m vs >200 m | Hospital based |
Northern Germany: Hoffmann et al (2008) | 1986–1998 | Leukaemia and lymphoma | 97/187 | SM in a subset | 0–75 | NA | Large overlap with study by Schuz (2001), which is included in this pooled analysis |
United States, Northern California: Does et al (2009) | 2004–2007 | Childhood leukaemia | 245/269 | SM WC | 0–8 | OR=0.57 (95% CI 0.3–1.93) for >0.3 μT vs <0.1 μT | No long-term measurements in child's bedroom Data not available in time |
Abbreviations: CF=calculated fields; CI=confidence interval; COR=case-only odds ratio; NA= not applicable; OR=odds ratio; SM=spot measurements; WC=wire codes; XRCC1=X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 1.