Table 3. Cox regression analysis including conventional prognostic markers and groups 1–3 and the HER2-positive group of cohort C based on our four-gene algorithm.
HR | 95% CI | P | |
---|---|---|---|
(a) OAS | |||
Grade | |||
I–II | 1 | ||
III—undifferentiated | 1.72 | 0.92–3.30 | 0.086 |
Positive nodes | |||
0–3 | 1 | ||
⩾4 | 3.21 | 1.14–9.01 | 0.027 |
Algorithm classification | |||
Group 1+3+HER2 positive. | 1 | ||
Group 2 | 3.94 | 1.92–8.09 | <0.001 |
Treatment group | |||
E-T-CMF | 1 | ||
E-CMF | 1.18 | 0.64–2.17 | 0.603 |
(b) DFS | |||
Grade | |||
I–II | 1 | ||
III–undifferentiated | 1.45 | 0.87–2.42 | 0.157 |
Positive nodes | |||
0–3 | 1 | ||
⩾4 | 2.21 | 1.05–4.65 | 0.038 |
Algorithm classification | |||
Group 1+3+HER2 positive. | 1 | ||
Group 2 | 2.18 | 1.10–4.34 | 0.026 |
Treatment group | |||
E-T-CMF | 1 | ||
E-CMF | 1.08 | 0.65–1.80 | 0.767 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; E-CMF=epirubicin-cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil; E-T-CMF=epirubicin-paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil; HER2=human epidermal growth factor 2; HR=hazards ratio; OAS=overall survival.
Only the presented algorithm and the number of positive nodes (⩾4) are independent predictors of outcome in this cohort.