Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 24;103(7):1048–1056. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605840

Table 3. Cox regression analysis including conventional prognostic markers and groups 1–3 and the HER2-positive group of cohort C based on our four-gene algorithm.

  HR 95% CI P
(a) OAS
 Grade      
  I–II 1    
  III—undifferentiated 1.72 0.92–3.30 0.086
 Positive nodes      
  0–3 1    
  ⩾4 3.21 1.14–9.01 0.027
 Algorithm classification      
  Group 1+3+HER2 positive. 1    
  Group 2 3.94 1.92–8.09 <0.001
 Treatment group      
  E-T-CMF 1    
  E-CMF 1.18 0.64–2.17 0.603
       
(b) DFS
 Grade      
  I–II 1    
  III–undifferentiated 1.45 0.87–2.42 0.157
 Positive nodes      
  0–3 1    
  ⩾4 2.21 1.05–4.65 0.038
 Algorithm classification      
  Group 1+3+HER2 positive. 1    
  Group 2 2.18 1.10–4.34 0.026
 Treatment group      
  E-T-CMF 1    
  E-CMF 1.08 0.65–1.80 0.767

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; E-CMF=epirubicin-cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil; E-T-CMF=epirubicin-paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil; HER2=human epidermal growth factor 2; HR=hazards ratio; OAS=overall survival.

Only the presented algorithm and the number of positive nodes (⩾4) are independent predictors of outcome in this cohort.