Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep;91(6):473–476. doi: 10.1308/003588409X432149

Table 1.

Summary of questionnaire responses

Question 1. Does unit have SE?
Total 84 Yes 20 (24%) No 64 (76%)
Question 2. Proportion referred
Total 22 <10% 2 9% 10–19% 2 9% 20–29% 2 9% 30–39% 3 14% 40–49% 1 5% 50–59% 4 18% 60–69% 1 5% 70–79% 1 5% 80–89% 2 9% 90–99% 0 0% 100% 3 14% Research only 1 5%
Question 3. Rate of non-compliance
Total 18 < 10% 1 6% 10–19% 4 22% 20–29% 3 17% 30–39% 3 17% 40–49% 0 0% 50–59% 6 33% 60–69% 0 0% 70–79% 1 6% 80–89% 0 0% 90–99% 0 0% 100% 0 0%
Question 4. Contra-indications Angina/IHD/ACS/MI Rest pain/tissue loss/CLI Musculoskeletal/arthritis Geographic/transport/distance to/Hospital COPD/reduced PFTs/respiratory compromise Employment constraints Mobility problems Hypertension Poor compliance Other
Total 48 13 27% 4 8% 4 8% 4 8% 4 8% 2 4% 2 4% 2 4% 2 4% 11 23%
Question 5. Session duration
Total 20 < 1 h 3 15% 1 h 17 85% 2 h 0 0% > 2 h 0 0%
Question 6. Frequency of sessions
Total 20 < 1×/week 2 10% 1×/week 13 65% 2×/week 4 20% 3×/week 1 5% > 3×/week 0 0%
Question 7. Duration of programme
Total 20 < 3 months 4 20% 3 months 11 55% 4 months 0 0% 5 months 0 0% 6 months 4 20% 6–12 months 0 0% > 1 year 0 0% Continuous 1 5%
Question 8. Class leader
Total 29 Physiotherapist 12 41% Nurse 14 48% Doctor 1 3% Other healthcare professional 0 0% Non-healthcare professional 2 7%
Question 9. If no service, advice given
Total 73 Verbal 46 63% Leaflet 25 34% Video 0 0% Demonstration 2 3% Other 0 0%
Question 10. If no service, existing obstacles
Total 65 Belief 1 2% Resource 47 72% Patient compliance 6 9% Other 11 17%

SE, supervised exercise; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; MI, myocardial infarction; CLI, critical limb ischaemia; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PFTs, pulmonary function tests.