Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Jul 29;212(3):309–320. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1953-1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Reaction time bias measures from the spatial cueing paradigm. a Experiment 1. Non-smokers (NS) showed a small bias toward smoking cues for both stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), while smokers (AS) showed a stronger bias to smoking cues in the 200-ms SOA condition, and a small bias in the 550-ms SOA condition. A mixed model repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant SOA × subject group interaction (F(1,44) =6.08, p=0.018). b Experiment 2. Familiarity with sports-related images had no effect on target reaction times in either sports enthusiasts (SE) or non-enthusiasts (NE). A mixed model repeated measures ANOVA found no significant main effects or interactions