Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Trauma Stress. 2006 Dec;19(6):813–823. doi: 10.1002/jts.20158

Table 3.

Hierarchial Regression Analyses of Residualized CAPS Scores by CSI Scores and Assault Type

Outcome Step β R2R2 Model F (df)
CSI-Problem Solving 0.72 (3, 109)
 1. Δ in problem solving −.17 .02
 2. assault type .01 .00
 3. Δ in problem solving by assault type .05 .00
CSI-Cognitive Restructuring 2.56 (3, 111)
 1. Δ in cognitive restructuring −.16 .06
 2. assault type .03 .00
 3. Δ in cognitive restructuring by assault type −.11 .01
CSI-Emotional Expression 1.90 (3, 112)
 1. Δ in emotional expression −.30* .04
 2. assault type .01 .00
 3. Δ in emotional expression by assault type .15 .01
CSI-Social Support 1.71 (3, 111)
 1. Δ in social support −.21 .04
 2. assault type −.01 .00
 3. Δ in social support by assault type .00 .00
CSI-Problem Avoidance .57 (3, 110)
 1. Δ in problem avoidance −.02 .00
 2. assault type .02 .00
 3. Δ in problem avoidance by assault type .13 .01
CSI-Wishful Thinking 1.63 (3, 111)
 1. Δ in wishful thinking .23 .04
 2. assault type .02 .00
 3. Δ in wishful thinking by assault type −.04 .001
CSI-Self-Criticism 1.04 (3, 112)
 1. Δ in self-criticism .24 .02
 2. assault type .10 .01
 3. Δ in self-criticism by assault type −.08 .01
CSI-Social Withdrawal 6.10 (3, 113)**
 1. Δ in social withdrawal .50*** .12
 2. assault type .11 .01
 3. Δ in social withdrawal by assault type −.18 .01

Note. βs are for the final model.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.